Mineral processing and beneficiating machinery manufacturing · Arizona

FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations

Tucson, AZ · ~247 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Mineral processing and beneficiating machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Mineral processing and beneficiating machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations safety composite

FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2019

FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333131 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Schenck Process LLC …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~247 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schenck Process LLC - Naperville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Mineral processing and beneficiating machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.3 · 2019=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations falls in its industry

105 Mineral processing and benefic establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Mineral processing and benefic employers in Arizona.

FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations (247 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations
FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations (247 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.3

FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations has more employees than the Mineral processing and beneficiating mac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.9 0.5 4 0 0
2017 1.3 0.9 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333131 · AZ · Tucson

105 Mineral processing and beneficiating machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schenck Process LLC - Naperville 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joy Global /dba/ Komatsu Mining 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joy Global Longview Operations LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Avenue 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dynalectric Arizona 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE HACI Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE Healthcareazllc 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - KRB3 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Fairport Harbor (Building 11) 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. PT 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Seymour Engine Plant 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Parker Houston TX 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Minerva Manufacturing Facility 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelly Southern Construction 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Industrial Rubber, Inc. 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lodi Plant 247 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.