Real estate asset management services (except property management) · California

JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office

Los Angeles, CA · ~121 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Real estate asset management services (except property management) workplace, earning a grade B.

JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office: 0.8 TCR = 60% of Real estate asset management services (except property management) BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office safety composite

JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2022 to 1.7 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531390 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.8 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/16
  • PHOTO Resort Vacations 3
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Resort Vacations 3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office averages 0.8 TCR (60% of the Real estate asset management services (except property management) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=1.7 · BLS 1.4

Where JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office falls in its industry

90 Real estate asset management s establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 16 Real estate asset management s employers in California.

JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office (121 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office
JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office (121 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.1

JRK Property Holdings Corporate Office has more employees than the Real estate asset management services (e median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531390 · CA · Los Angeles

90 Real estate asset management services (except property management) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Resort Vacations 3 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wylie Inn & Conference Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centralized Showing Service-OP KS 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centralized Showing Service-DFW TX 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Naumann Ranch 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Illume Agriculture, LLC 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village Nurseries Miramar Yard 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Collier Road Complex 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Continental Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Centra Business Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR City of St. Charles General Administration 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HP Hood- Vernon Transportation 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE ISD #97 Moose Lake 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE AgMart Produce SFL 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE UCC Institute Facility 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kirby Risk Electrical Supply 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.