Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · South Carolina

JTEKT Automotive South Carolina

Piedmont, SC · ~136 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JTEKT Automotive South Carolina runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

JTEKT Automotive South Carolina: 5.2 TCR = 96% of Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JTEKT Automotive South Carolina safety composite

JTEKT Automotive South Carolina scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2018→2023

JTEKT Automotive South Carolina injury rate improved

JTEKT Automotive South Carolina's TCR fell 3.3 from 4.8 in 2018 to 1.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.8 · 2019=3.8 · 2021=6.0 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Piedmont, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/11
  • PHOTO TEAM Cambridge, Inc
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~136 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TEAM Cambridge, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

JTEKT Automotive South Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JTEKT Automotive South Carolina averages 5.2 TCR (96% of the Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JTEKT Automotive South Carolina TCR series: 2018=4.8 · 2019=3.8 · 2021=6 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=1.5 · BLS 5.4

Where JTEKT Automotive South Carolina falls in its industry

320 Drive shafts and half shafts, establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 11 Drive shafts and half shafts, employers in South Carolina.

JTEKT Automotive South Carolina (136 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate JTEKT Automotive South Carolina
JTEKT Automotive South Carolina (136 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

JTEKT Automotive South Carolina has fewer employees than the Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.5 0.0 1 1 0
2022 9.8 7.8 4 6 0
2021 6.0 5.0 5 1 0
2019 3.8 1.9 6 0 0
2018 4.8 1.1 4 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · SC · Piedmont

320 Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 71 employers in Piedmont, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TEAM Cambridge, Inc 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metform LLC / Hot Formed Products 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meritor - Morganton 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thyssenkrupp Crankshaft LLC 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waldrop Inc 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parkdale America LLC Plant 7 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reynolds Company 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milliken & Company Dewey Plant 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drive Automotive Industries of America 1,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Blood Connection 657 FTE
CITY-NEAR PL Developments - OGR Plant 591 FTE
CITY-NEAR C453 Greenville 372 FTE
NAT-TCR Scapa Tapes NA, Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cone Distributing Tallahassee 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR White Star Electric, LLC 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincoln Terminal 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tube Forgings of America, Inc. 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Paper Morristown Container 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenfield Healthcare Center 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mankato Motor Company 136 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.