Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction · Washington

JTM Construction

Seattle, WA · ~163 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JTM Construction runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

JTM Construction: 1.9 TCR = 66% of Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JTM Construction safety composite

JTM Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2018→2024

JTM Construction injury rate improved

JTM Construction's TCR fell 2.9 from 3.4 in 2018 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.4 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Seattle, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #30/127
  • PHOTO Bast Hatfield Constr…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bast Hatfield Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

JTM Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JTM Construction averages 1.9 TCR (66% of the Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JTM Construction TCR series: 2018=3.4 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 2.9

Where JTM Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse, commercial and inst establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 127 Warehouse, commercial and inst employers in Washington.

JTM Construction (163 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate JTM Construction
JTM Construction (163 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

JTM Construction has more employees than the Warehouse, commercial and institutional, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2023 1.2 0.4 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.9 1.3 6 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.4 4.4 4 0 0
2018 3.4 3.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · WA · Seattle

4,692 Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bast Hatfield Construction 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kirk Bros Co, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4020189 - China Lake South Airfield 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burlington Redlands #517 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northwest Cannabis Solutions 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Delivery 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grays Harbor Public Utility District No. 1 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Snyder Roofing of Washington, LLC 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Superior Beverage Group 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ausco Products Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bush Hog Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Riverside Healthcare Center 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE STA - Paterson/Fairlawn 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westfields Marriott Washington Dulles 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ventra Grand Rapids 29 LLC 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.