healthcare facility · Maryland

Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Hagerstown, MD · ~147 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical healthcare facility workplace, earning a grade D.

Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 5.2 TCR = 137% of healthcare facility BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.4

2016→2019

Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 10.4 from 10.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.4 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621999 · Hagerstown, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 137% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Beverly Hospital
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beverly Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 5.2 TCR (137% of the healthcare facility BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=10.4 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

461 healthcare facility establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 healthcare facility employers in Maryland.

Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (147 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (147 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Julia Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the healthcare facility median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 10.4 7.2 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621999 · MD · Hagerstown

461 healthcare facility employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 205 employers in Hagerstown, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beverly Hospital 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5109 - CA San Diego Central Jail - NaphCare of San Diego 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5100 - CO Pueblo County Detention Center 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHYSICIAN HMO INC/PhysicianCorrectional (Oficina Central) 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carl Belt Inc. 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bernward Mechanical and Construction Solutions 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linemark Printing Inc. 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Marsh MD 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritus Health 2,796 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritus Medical Center 2,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-HAGE 1,921 FTE
CITY-NEAR Volvo Group Trucks Operations - Hagerstown, Maryland 1,592 FTE
NAT-TCR Overhead Door of Kansas City 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR La Aqueduct Filtration Plant 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 500 ABC Supply Co., inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Masters Company, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at City of Hope Nat'L Med Ctr-Fd 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pettibone : Bartell 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE HomeLife, Inc. 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pyramid Woodbridge Management LLC 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.