Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Juniper Springs Senior Living

Redmond, OR · ~51 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Juniper Springs Senior Living runs at 181% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Juniper Springs Senior Living: 6.9 TCR = 181% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Juniper Springs Senior Living safety composite

Juniper Springs Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.6

2018→2024

Juniper Springs Senior Living injury rate improved

Juniper Springs Senior Living's TCR fell 14.6 from 14.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 19.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=14.6 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=19.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Redmond, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.9 · 181% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #73/218
  • PHOTO 63116 SUNRISE OF BOU…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 63116 SUNRISE OF BOULDER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Juniper Springs Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Juniper Springs Senior Living averages 6.9 TCR (181% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Juniper Springs Senior Living TCR series: 2018=14.6 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=19.5 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Juniper Springs Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Juniper Springs Senior Living (51 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Juniper Springs Senior Living
Juniper Springs Senior Living (51 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Juniper Springs Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 19.5 17.3 5 4 0
2020 0.4 0.3 6 0 0
2018 14.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Redmond

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 90 employers in Redmond, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 63116 SUNRISE OF BOULDER 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CP- Coconut Creek Development I, LLC 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loma Clara Senior Living 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S-H Thirty-Five OpCo Vero Beach, LLC 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE SJJD Consulting 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE SURFACE NURSERY INC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springfield 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE 00448 PORTLAND METRO OP CTR 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond School District 975 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Desert Education Services 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Charles Health System Redmond 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR BasX Solutions 483 FTE
NAT-TCR Schluter Systems, Reno 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dfa Distributing North - Schuylkill Haven Pa 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 5622 - Alpharetta 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR B16 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Complete Care at Victoria Commons, LLC 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HAU1 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harbor Labs - Public Utilities 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Resource Center - Lakeshore Drive 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.