Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Juniper Village at Forest Hills

Pittsburgh, PA · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Juniper Village at Forest Hills runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Juniper Village at Forest Hills: 1.1 TCR = 28% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Juniper Village at Forest Hills safety composite

Juniper Village at Forest Hills scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2022→2023

Juniper Village at Forest Hills injury rate improved

Juniper Village at Forest Hills's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.1 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/257
  • PHOTO Columbine Health Sys…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Columbine Health Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Juniper Village at Forest Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Juniper Village at Forest Hills averages 1.1 TCR (28% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Juniper Village at Forest Hills TCR series: 2022=2.1 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Juniper Village at Forest Hills falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 257 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Juniper Village at Forest Hills (67 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Juniper Village at Forest Hills
Juniper Village at Forest Hills (67 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Juniper Village at Forest Hills has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Pittsburgh

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Columbine Health Systems 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadowlake Retirement Village 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SharonBrooke Inn 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Senior Care Solutions 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Metzler Forest Products LLC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE MC OpCo, LLC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seward Operating, LLC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Utilities Lancaster 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Ferco Tech LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Vernon Township School Dist 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : MFG-FairLawn NJ-USA 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southern Atlantic : SVC-Richmond VA-USA 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aperion Care Plum Grove 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE FAT Fresno Yosemite International Airport 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Red Cross - 1111 Research Dr 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1970-03136A 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.