Cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons made from refined petroleum or liquid hydrocarbons · Texas

JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc.

Pasadena, TX · ~102 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc. runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons made from refined petroleum or liquid hydrocarbons workplace, earning a grade A.

JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons made from refined petroleum or liquid hydrocarbons BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc. safety composite

JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc. held a steady TCR band

JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325110 · Pasadena, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/38
  • PHOTO NuCera Solutions LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NuCera Solutions LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons made from refined petroleum or liquid hydrocarbons BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc. falls in its industry

66 Cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons m establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 38 Cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons m employers in Texas.

JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc. (102 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 213 employees and a TCR of 0.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 00.511.52 Average employees Total Case Rate JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc.
JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc. (102 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 213 employees and a TCR of 0.5

JX NIPPON Chemical Texas Inc. has fewer employees than the Cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons made from r median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325110 · TX · Pasadena

66 Cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons made from refined petroleum or liquid hydrocarbons employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 385 employers in Pasadena, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NuCera Solutions LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Texas Operations 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calumet Karns City Refining 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shell Chemical Norco 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6458-ZAMA 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Lev at Winchester 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4795-PD-SAT-SAN ANTONIO-PD 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4054-ABS-0020-0021-04102 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSC Group 4,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroleum Service Corporation 3,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR JVIC 3,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brand Energy Solutions, LLC - Houston 2,015 FTE
NAT-TCR J.B. Bostick Company Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Evans Construction Company 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shimizu North America LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AkzoNobel Powder Coatings Inc. Reading Manufacturing 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marshall Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Facility 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeside Foods, Inc Manitowoc Plant 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Genesis Behavioral Hospital 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE AVX Filters Corporation 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.