Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing · Michigan

Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining

Kalamazoo, MI · ~43 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining safety composite

Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining held a steady TCR band

Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325411 · Kalamazoo, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/6
  • PHOTO 6319-020061
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6319-020061 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining falls in its industry

260 Medicinal and Botanical Manufa establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 6 Medicinal and Botanical Manufa employers in Michigan.

Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining (43 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining
Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining (43 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Kalamazoo A.M. Todd Mint Processing/Refining has fewer employees than the Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325411 · MI · Kalamazoo

260 Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 353 employers in Kalamazoo, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6319-020061 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Young Living Holding LLC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genzyme 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rahway, NJ Facility 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coldwater 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - Battle Creek 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE DUWA 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE THOMAS J MOYLE JR INC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bronson Methodist Hospital 4,909 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pfizer Kalamazoo - Portage Road 3,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Instruments 2,240 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIKAL1 2,103 FTE
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wind Energy Transmission Texas LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Health Care Professionals - Waconia 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peck's Market of Livingston Manor, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harry Miller Co., LLC 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.