Surface active agents manufacturing · North Carolina

Kao Specialties Americas LLC

High Point, NC · ~156 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kao Specialties Americas LLC runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Surface active agents manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Kao Specialties Americas LLC: 3.7 TCR = 112% of Surface active agents manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kao Specialties Americas LLC safety composite

Kao Specialties Americas LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kao Specialties Americas LLC: 1.3 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2024

Kao Specialties Americas LLC's TCR rose 2.0 from 1.3 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325613 · High Point, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 112% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Applied Textiles, In…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Applied Textiles, Inc. - Michigan Location (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Kao Specialties Americas LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kao Specialties Americas LLC averages 3.7 TCR (112% of the Surface active agents manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kao Specialties Americas LLC TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=3 · 2018=8 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Kao Specialties Americas LLC falls in its industry

66 Surface active agents manufact establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Surface active agents manufact employers in North Carolina.

Kao Specialties Americas LLC (156 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kao Specialties Americas LLC
Kao Specialties Americas LLC (156 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Kao Specialties Americas LLC has more employees than the Surface active agents manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 2.0 4 1 0
2023 4.8 2.8 5 2 0
2022 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 5.8 3.6 1 7 0
2020 4.1 2.1 6 0 0
2019 2.5 1.2 4 0 0
2018 8.0 6.1 8 5 0
2017 3.0 1.2 5 0 0
2016 1.3 0.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325613 · NC · High Point

66 Surface active agents manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Applied Textiles, Inc. - Michigan Location 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICT Walnut Grove 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pilot Chemical Company - Lockland 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Carolina Electric Cooperatives 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. S. Construction, Inc. 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE I40/440 - Project 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schindler Clinton Escalator Plant 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Kirk & Blum Columbia 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BDV 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tingue, Peachtree City 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Redner's Warehouse Market Exeter 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lyman Hall High School 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE OHL 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Parts Distribution Center 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crescent Crown Distributing, L.L.C. // Baton Rouge 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.