Building framing (except structural steel) · California

Karsyn Construction, Inc.

Fresno, CA · ~68 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Karsyn Construction, Inc. runs at 312% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building framing (except structural steel) workplace, earning a grade F.

Karsyn Construction, Inc.: 8.7 TCR = 312% of Building framing (except structural steel) BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Karsyn Construction, Inc. safety composite

Karsyn Construction, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Karsyn Construction, Inc. injury rate improved

Karsyn Construction, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 2.7 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 18.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=18.5 · 2019=13.5 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=14.5 · 2022=11.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238130 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 312% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #53/99
  • PHOTO North American Fores…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North American Forest Edwardsburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Karsyn Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Karsyn Construction, Inc. averages 8.7 TCR (312% of the Building framing (except structural steel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Karsyn Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=18.5 · 2019=13.5 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=14.5 · 2022=11.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Karsyn Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

387 Building framing (except struc establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 99 Building framing (except struc employers in California.

Karsyn Construction, Inc. (68 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Karsyn Construction, Inc.
Karsyn Construction, Inc. (68 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Karsyn Construction, Inc. has more employees than the Building framing (except structural stee median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.2 11.2 5 0 0
2021 14.5 14.5 5 0 0
2020 8.3 8.3 3 1 0
2019 13.5 13.5 9 0 0
2018 18.5 16.5 8 1 0
2017 8.2 8.2 4 0 0
2016 2.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238130 · CA · Fresno

387 Building framing (except structural steel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North American Forest Edwardsburg 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colt Builders Corp 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inland Empire Framing INc 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Construction Southwest of AZ, Inc. 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Valley Land Co. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCFFO 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE VinePro Vineyard Management, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knights Grapevine Nursery 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Heights Crossing 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Stark Truss Co., Inc. Franklin, KY 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR El Coyote Ranch 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR I.K. Stoltzfus Service Corp. 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Belstra Milling Company, Inc. 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaumont Neches 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mastermelt 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith County High School 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.