Wood frame component (e.g., truss) fabrication on site · Michigan

North American Forest Edwardsburg

Edwardsburg, MI · ~241 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North American Forest Edwardsburg runs at 311% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Wood frame component (e.g., truss) fabrication on site workplace, earning a grade F.

North American Forest Edwardsburg: 8.7 TCR = 311% of Wood frame component (e.g., truss) fabrication on site BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North American Forest Edwardsburg safety composite

North American Forest Edwardsburg scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2016→2022

North American Forest Edwardsburg injury rate improved

North American Forest Edwardsburg's TCR fell 7.0 from 11.3 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.3 · 2017=18.7 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=7.3 · 2022=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238130 · Edwardsburg, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 311% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO Karsyn Construction,…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 100 inj
  • SIZE ~241 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Karsyn Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

North American Forest Edwardsburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North American Forest Edwardsburg averages 8.7 TCR (311% of the Wood frame component (e.g., truss) fabrication on site BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North American Forest Edwardsburg TCR series: 2016=11.3 · 2017=18.7 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=7.3 · 2022=4.3 · BLS 2.8

Where North American Forest Edwardsburg falls in its industry

387 Wood frame component (e.g., tr establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Wood frame component (e.g., tr employers in Michigan.

North American Forest Edwardsburg (241 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate North American Forest Edwardsburg
North American Forest Edwardsburg (241 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6

North American Forest Edwardsburg has more employees than the Wood frame component (e.g., truss) fabri median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.3 3.4 9 0 0
2020 7.3 4.1 16 0 0
2019 2.5 0.8 5 1 0
2018 8.1 4.5 21 2 0
2017 18.7 9.3 23 27 0
2016 11.3 11.3 26 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238130 · MI · Edwardsburg

387 Wood frame component (e.g., truss) fabrication on site employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 6 employers in Edwardsburg, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Karsyn Construction, Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colt Builders Corp 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inland Empire Framing INc 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Framing Structures, Inc. 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE House of Flavors, Inc 241 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 241 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arauco North America 241 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Mitsuba Corporation/Michigan 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR North American Moulding 245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duo-Form Plastics 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midwest Timber Plant 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCURY DISPLACEMENT INDUSTRIES, INC. 35 FTE
NAT-TCR KDN Logistics, LLP 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #555 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 547642-Sea-University Sta 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 053324-Hawthorne Po 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cascade Medical 241 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titan Electric, Inc., dba FB Titan 241 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rossville Manufacturing Facility 241 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2530 Joplin Folding 241 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.