Facilities (except computer operation) support services · Alaska

Katmai Information Technologies

Anchorage, AK · ~275 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Katmai Information Technologies runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Facilities (except computer operation) support services workplace, earning a grade B.

Katmai Information Technologies: 1.6 TCR = 60% of Facilities (except computer operation) support services BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Katmai Information Technologies safety composite

Katmai Information Technologies scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2019

Katmai Information Technologies injury rate improved

Katmai Information Technologies's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Anchorage, AK AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO WFS- Netl Albany
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~275 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WFS- Netl Albany (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

Katmai Information Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Katmai Information Technologies averages 1.6 TCR (60% of the Facilities (except computer operation) support services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Katmai Information Technologies TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Katmai Information Technologies falls in its industry

757 Facilities (except computer op establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Facilities (except computer op employers in Alaska.

Katmai Information Technologies (275 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Katmai Information Technologies
Katmai Information Technologies (275 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Katmai Information Technologies has more employees than the Facilities (except computer operation) s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.1 1.6 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · AK · Anchorage

757 Facilities (except computer operation) support services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 704 employers in Anchorage, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WFS- Netl Albany 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR OnSite Facility Services LLC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cisco SJO 02 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dept. of Health & Social Services (10) 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE 701-00017 274 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairbanks Native Association - McKinley 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairbanks Native Association - WCCIH 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000198 4,453 FTE
CITY-NEAR AK10 PROVIDENCE ALASKA MEDICAL CTR-ANCHORAGE 2,864 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alaska Native Medical Center 2,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR GCI Communication Corp. 1,935 FTE
NAT-TCR Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs-Central Office 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Materials Handling : MFG-Kent, WA-USA 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Quality Specialties, Inc. - Virginia Operations 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR US PA Rochester Plant 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Akron Innovation Center - Goodyear 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anheuser-Busch Newark Brewery 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Simplot Phosphates LLC 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Watertown Family YMCA Childcare 275 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.