Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing · Illinois

Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW

Lawrenceville, IL · ~106 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW runs at 409% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW: 13.5 TCR = 409% of Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW safety composite

Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW held a steady TCR band

Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW's TCR held near 0.0 from 14.6 in 2016 to 14.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.6 · 2017=11.4 · 2018=14.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Lawrenceville, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.5 · 409% of ind

  • DART 10.4 DART
  • RANK #17/17
  • PHOTO 2967-CA184
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2967-CA184 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW averages 13.5 TCR (409% of the Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW TCR series: 2016=14.6 · 2017=11.4 · 2018=14.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW falls in its industry

334 Harness assemblies for electro establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 17 Harness assemblies for electro employers in Illinois.

Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW (106 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW
Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW (106 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Kauffman Engineering, Inc. LAW has fewer employees than the Harness assemblies for electronic use ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 14.5 10.4 14 0 0
2017 11.4 10.4 11 0 0
2016 14.6 10.7 14 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · IL · Lawrenceville

334 Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 10 employers in Lawrenceville, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2967-CA184 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indiana 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electronic Source Company 17.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCHOTT North America Electronic Packaging 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kincaid Power Station 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Department of Public Utilities - Electric 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Division of Transportation 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE CECO Concrete : Tribco - Chicago 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Boshoku Illinois LLC 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence County Memorial Hosptial 205 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 550 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence County Memorial Hospital 184 FTE
NAT-TCR PDX - Airport United Airlines Offices 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridgewater Wholesalers, Inc. 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CPI Products LLC 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Avante at Harrisonburg 13.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fischer Point 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. George Healthcare 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland OR (Elrod Dr) Distribution Center 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Healthcare 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.