Apartment building rental or leasing · Arizona

Kay-Kay Realty Corp.

Scottsdale, AZ · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kay-Kay Realty Corp. runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Apartment building rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade A.

Kay-Kay Realty Corp.: 0.4 TCR = 29% of Apartment building rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kay-Kay Realty Corp. safety composite

Kay-Kay Realty Corp. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kay-Kay Realty Corp. held a steady TCR band

Kay-Kay Realty Corp.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · Scottsdale, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/24
  • PHOTO Churchill Living NY
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Churchill Living NY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Kay-Kay Realty Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kay-Kay Realty Corp. averages 0.4 TCR (29% of the Apartment building rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kay-Kay Realty Corp. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Kay-Kay Realty Corp. falls in its industry

1,100 Apartment building rental or l establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 24 Apartment building rental or l employers in Arizona.

Kay-Kay Realty Corp. (28 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kay-Kay Realty Corp.
Kay-Kay Realty Corp. (28 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Kay-Kay Realty Corp. has fewer employees than the Apartment building rental or leasing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · AZ · Scottsdale

1,100 Apartment building rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 531 employers in Scottsdale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Churchill Living NY 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Administation Office 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DC Corporate Office 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Dolben Company Inc. 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABACA 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tatum 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tonopah 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cholla Livestock 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Educational Services LLC 6,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Scottsdale 4,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHEA MEDICAL CTR CAMPUS 2,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPPORT SERVICES CAMPUS 2,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Newville 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Customer Service Group Carson City Repair Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sika Illinois 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlantic Contracting and Specialties LLC - NYC 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 004/Eastern Mennonite University 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monticello 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 034/Oklahoma Wesleyan University 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wendel Poultry Service Inc. 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.