Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Missouri

KCP&L - Northland Service Center

Kansas City, MO · ~76 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

KCP&L - Northland Service Center runs at 267% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

KCP&L - Northland Service Center: 3.2 TCR = 267% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

KCP&L - Northland Service Center safety composite

KCP&L - Northland Service Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

KCP&L - Northland Service Center held a steady TCR band

KCP&L - Northland Service Center's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.3 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Kansas City, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.2 · 267% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #33/42
  • PHOTO Plant Scherer
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant Scherer (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

KCP&L - Northland Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows KCP&L - Northland Service Center averages 3.2 TCR (267% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

KCP&L - Northland Service Center TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=1.1 · BLS 1.2

Where KCP&L - Northland Service Center falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 42 Electric power generation, fos employers in Missouri.

KCP&L - Northland Service Center (76 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate KCP&L - Northland Service Center
KCP&L - Northland Service Center (76 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

KCP&L - Northland Service Center has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2017 7.2 7.2 6 0 0
2016 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MO · Kansas City

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plant Scherer 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danskammer Generating Station 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant Bowen 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guadalupe Energy Center 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Howell-Oregon Electric Cooperative, Inc. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bilfinger Industrial Services Inc. Home Office 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knoebel Construction, Inc. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kansas City Regional Bakery - Main Store 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Berry Rd 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-NY-Elmsford-Ridgewood Drive 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LPCC - Ontario Rebond 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Raft River Malta Office 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 003 TRC Charter at Beaver Creek 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCC of Booker T Washington Rehabilitation Center 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whitesboro Health and Rehabilitation Center 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Ambulatory Care Center 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.