Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · New York

Danskammer Generating Station

Newburgh, NY · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Danskammer Generating Station runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Danskammer Generating Station: 3.2 TCR = 268% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Danskammer Generating Station safety composite

Danskammer Generating Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Danskammer Generating Station held a steady TCR band

Danskammer Generating Station's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.6 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=12.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Newburgh, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.2 · 268% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #22/29
  • PHOTO Plant Scherer
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant Scherer (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Danskammer Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Danskammer Generating Station averages 3.2 TCR (268% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Danskammer Generating Station TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=5 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=12.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Danskammer Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 29 Electric power generation, fos employers in New York.

Danskammer Generating Station (37 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Danskammer Generating Station
Danskammer Generating Station (37 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Danskammer Generating Station has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2023 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 12.9 12.9 0 5 0
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NY · Newburgh

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 104 employers in Newburgh, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plant Scherer 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR KCP&L - Northland Service Center 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant Bowen 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guadalupe Energy Center 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kludt Brothers Inc. 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE PharmaCann Hamptonburgh 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cruikshank Farms LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main farm 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Cornwall Hospital- Newburgh 1,231 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Cornwall Hospital-Newburgh 1,085 FTE
CITY-NEAR Empress Ambulance Services Inc. South 632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independent Home Care, Inc. 487 FTE
NAT-TCR Inventory Trading Company 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CAROLINA 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Designers Choice Cabinetry, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lockheed Architectural Solutions, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE N R Weaver Masonry 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beeler Industries 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston OEC 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owens Products, Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.