Barrels, new and reconditioned, merchant wholesalers · New Jersey

Kearny Steel Container

Newark, NJ · ~129 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kearny Steel Container runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Barrels, new and reconditioned, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Kearny Steel Container: 3.8 TCR = 173% of Barrels, new and reconditioned, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kearny Steel Container safety composite

Kearny Steel Container scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2016→2024

Kearny Steel Container injury rate improved

Kearny Steel Container's TCR fell 5.7 from 9.0 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.0 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423840 · Newark, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 173% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #8/13
  • PHOTO 200630
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 200630 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Kearny Steel Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kearny Steel Container averages 3.8 TCR (173% of the Barrels, new and reconditioned, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kearny Steel Container TCR series: 2016=9 · 2018=6 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Kearny Steel Container falls in its industry

589 Barrels, new and reconditioned establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 13 Barrels, new and reconditioned employers in New Jersey.

Kearny Steel Container (129 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kearny Steel Container
Kearny Steel Container (129 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Kearny Steel Container has more employees than the Barrels, new and reconditioned, merchant median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 1.3 3 2 0
2023 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2022 2.6 1.3 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.5 0.8 2 0 0
2019 6.5 5.7 7 1 0
2018 6.0 4.3 6 1 0
2016 9.0 5.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423840 · NJ · Newark

589 Barrels, new and reconditioned, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 200630 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ranpak 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeland SBS 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NC100 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 201-NJ-New Jersey Central 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Automated Logic Controls (New York-New Jersey) 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Associated Fire Protection, Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newark Container 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR Albany DC 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #4050 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Design Distributors Inc 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Galleria 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CertainTeed Jonesburg 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Shores Nursing and Rehab Center 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest Health Medical Center, LLC 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Luxium Solutions - Hiram 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.