Correctional institutions · Virginia

Keen Mountain Correctional Center

Oakwood, VA · ~316 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keen Mountain Correctional Center runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade D.

Keen Mountain Correctional Center: 4.9 TCR = 153% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keen Mountain Correctional Center safety composite

Keen Mountain Correctional Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2016→2024

Keen Mountain Correctional Center injury rate improved

Keen Mountain Correctional Center's TCR fell 5.2 from 14.3 in 2016 to 9.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.3 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=9.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Oakwood, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 153% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #39/51
  • PHOTO Baltimore City Corre…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~316 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baltimore City Correctional Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Keen Mountain Correctional Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keen Mountain Correctional Center averages 4.9 TCR (153% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keen Mountain Correctional Center TCR series: 2016=14.3 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=9 · BLS 3.2

Where Keen Mountain Correctional Center falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 51 Correctional institutions employers in Virginia.

Keen Mountain Correctional Center (316 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Keen Mountain Correctional Center (316 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Keen Mountain Correctional Center has more employees than the Correctional institutions median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.0 8.3 14 11 0
2023 1.1 1.1 4 0 0
2022 6.9 1.0 18 2 0
2020 2.3 2.3 7 0 0
2019 3.5 2.3 10 1 0
2018 1.5 1.5 5 0 0
2017 0.6 0.6 1 1 0
2016 14.3 14.3 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · VA · Oakwood

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 5 employers in Oakwood, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baltimore City Correctional Center 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minnesota Correctional Facility (MCF)-Togo 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAI -- BOSTON AVENUE 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CORPUS CHRISTI TRANS CTR 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE High Liner Foods USA Inc. 316 FTE
STATE-SIZE ArtFX Norfolk 316 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1682 316 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROANOKE_1441283 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR O&M Jewell 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakwood 39 FTE
NAT-TCR DOT Randolph Transp Depot 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Peddinghaus Corporation - PCSC 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 190 - Angola 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Airmasters Mechanical Contractor 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Buckman's Inc. 316 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saxonburg, PA 316 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aso LLC 316 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morrow Equipment Company LLC 316 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.