Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, tars) made in coke oven establishments · Virginia

SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation

Oakwood, VA · ~99 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, tars) made in coke oven establishments workplace, earning a grade A.

SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, tars) made in coke oven establishments BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation safety composite

SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation held a steady TCR band

SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=2.2 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 324199 · Oakwood, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK P71
  • PHOTO Nexus Circular Atlanta
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nexus Circular Atlanta (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, tars) made in coke oven establishments BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=2.2 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation falls in its industry

52 Coke oven products (e.g., coke establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation (99 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation
SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation (99 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 2.0

SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation has more employees than the Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2023 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2017 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

324199 · VA · Oakwood

52 Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, tars) made in coke oven establishments employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 5 employers in Oakwood, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nexus Circular Atlanta 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oxbow Calcining Port Arthur 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calumet Dickinson Refining 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rain CII Carbon - Norco 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE LEO Construction Co. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maddox Air & Electrical 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minton and Roberson Inc. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mainland 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR Keen Mountain Correctional Center 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR O&M Jewell 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakwood 39 FTE
NAT-TCR Russo Development Enterprises, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tecta America East LLC - Glen Rock 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dora Hotel Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Southway Crane & Rigging - Pensacola Branch 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Granite Construction Company - Illinois Region 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency Hospital of Northwest Indiana LLC (Porter County) 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia River Dairy LLC 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Inn at Sarasota Bay Club 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.