Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Indiana

Keepsake Village of Columbus

Columbus, IN · ~27 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keepsake Village of Columbus runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Keepsake Village of Columbus: 8.3 TCR = 218% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keepsake Village of Columbus safety composite

Keepsake Village of Columbus scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2017→2022

Keepsake Village of Columbus injury rate improved

Keepsake Village of Columbus's TCR fell 3.4 from 8.1 in 2017 to 4.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 25.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=25.2 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbus, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 218% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #87/133
  • PHOTO Residences at Deer C…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Residences at Deer Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Keepsake Village of Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keepsake Village of Columbus averages 8.3 TCR (218% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keepsake Village of Columbus TCR series: 2017=8.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=25.2 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=4.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Keepsake Village of Columbus falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 133 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Keepsake Village of Columbus (27 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Keepsake Village of Columbus
Keepsake Village of Columbus (27 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Keepsake Village of Columbus has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2020 25.2 25.2 0 9 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.1 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IN · Columbus

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 141 employers in Columbus, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Residences at Deer Creek 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Santa Barbara 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63137 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBK - Charleston 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fischer Seeds 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strauss Feed Mill 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Fuel Production of Michigan 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Energy of McBain 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Material Handling, Inc. 1,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR NTN Driveshaft Inc. 1,756 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Engine Plant 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commons Office Building 1,248 FTE
NAT-TCR 058046-Vacaville Po 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 072333-Den-Capitol Hill Sta 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 485625-Marble Falls Po 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 167064-Sch-Hoffman Estates Br 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE IEDS Freight Systems, Inc 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Littleton CO Sales Admin 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Resource Management, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverview Services, Inc. 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.