Flagging (i.e., traffic control) services · California

Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc.

Atascadero, CA · ~60 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc. runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Flagging (i.e., traffic control) services workplace, earning a grade C.

Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc.: 2.8 TCR = 106% of Flagging (i.e., traffic control) services BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc. safety composite

Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2022→2024

Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc. injury rate improved

Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.4 from 4.0 in 2022 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.0 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561990 · Atascadero, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #12/20
  • PHOTO 230 Kingsport
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 230 Kingsport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc. averages 2.8 TCR (106% of the Flagging (i.e., traffic control) services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc. TCR series: 2022=4 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 2.6

Where Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc. falls in its industry

208 Flagging (i.e., traffic contro establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 20 Flagging (i.e., traffic contro employers in California.

Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc.
Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Kellie Avila Construction Services, Inc. has more employees than the Flagging (i.e., traffic control) service median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2023 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2022 4.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561990 · CA · Atascadero

208 Flagging (i.e., traffic control) services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 42 employers in Atascadero, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 230 Kingsport 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bartlett, TN 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 207 Orlando 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Billings, MT 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Coast Vineyards 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming Cooperative, Inc | Grapes Delano 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paiva Farm Management 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocket Farms Herbs Inc Thermal 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Department of State Hospitals - Atascadero 1,973 FTE
CITY-NEAR DSH-Atascadero 1,879 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rokstad Power Inc. 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0029-0029-02314 FAC-02314-ATASCADERO-CA 123 FTE
NAT-TCR AVE Blue Bell 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mco Ltl 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Down to Earth Kailua 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Park University 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Promises Brazos Valley 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE JOMKDC Pharmaceutical Services Shepherdsville 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fermer Precision 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Master Maintenance, Inc. 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.