Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing · Oklahoma

Kemper Sulphur Facility

Sulphur, OK · ~69 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kemper Sulphur Facility runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Kemper Sulphur Facility: 2.5 TCR = 75% of Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kemper Sulphur Facility safety composite

Kemper Sulphur Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kemper Sulphur Facility held a steady TCR band

Kemper Sulphur Facility's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.1 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Sulphur, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 75% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #7/12
  • PHOTO Salina Vortex Corpor…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Salina Vortex Corporation - Vortex 1725 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Kemper Sulphur Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kemper Sulphur Facility averages 2.5 TCR (75% of the Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kemper Sulphur Facility TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Kemper Sulphur Facility falls in its industry

298 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 12 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., employers in Oklahoma.

Kemper Sulphur Facility (69 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kemper Sulphur Facility
Kemper Sulphur Facility (69 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Kemper Sulphur Facility has fewer employees than the Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, ga median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 1.2 2 0 0
2017 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · OK · Sulphur

298 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 9 employers in Sulphur, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Salina Vortex Corporation - Vortex 1725 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pearl Street Facility 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR VM01-VM-VAL-MATIC ELMHURST 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Admiral Valve LLC dba CPV Manufacturing 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Exterior Solutions by Craig's Roofing, Inc 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hammer Construction INC 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Collar Pet Foods 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enid Flour Mill 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arbuckle Memorial Hospital 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 225 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR 225 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chickasaw Telephone 122 FTE
NAT-TCR Boyer's Food Markets -Orwigbsurg 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Akro-Mils 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 130 Macon, Ga 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 3123 Family Fare (Roughrider Rd, Dickinson ND) 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nursing 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1520 Fife DC 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avita of Wells 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE HCP Delray Beach FL OpCo, LLC 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.