Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Idaho

Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa

Nampa, ID · ~173 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade B.

Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa: 2.5 TCR = 75% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa safety composite

Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa: 2.3 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2024

Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa's TCR rose 0.5 from 2.3 in 2023 to 2.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Nampa, ID AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 75% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #5/18
  • PHOTO Second STC Motors LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Second STC Motors LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa averages 2.5 TCR (75% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa TCR series: 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.4

Where Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 18 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Idaho.

Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa (173 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa
Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa (173 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Kendall Chevrolet/Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Kia - Nampa has more employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.1 4 0 0
2023 2.3 1.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · ID · Nampa

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 228 employers in Nampa, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Second STC Motors LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hickory 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kendall Ford/Lincoln - Anchorage 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Doral Hyundai 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parma Seed Processing Site 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4054-ABS-0030-0030-00182 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE 837050001 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sysco Idaho 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BOI2 2,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center, Nampa (Garrity)-SAHS-ID/OR 1,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Nampa 922 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lactalis Nampa 863 FTE
NAT-TCR The U Company 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Livingston Branch 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MP Global Products 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Auburn 10183 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE PhytogenX 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wellington Foods Inc. 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE TDK Components USA, Inc. 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atom Banana Inc. 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.