Alarm apparatus, electric, merchant wholesalers · Michigan

Kendall Electric - ESCB

Grand Rapids, MI · ~50 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kendall Electric - ESCB runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Alarm apparatus, electric, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Kendall Electric - ESCB: 0.8 TCR = 39% of Alarm apparatus, electric, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kendall Electric - ESCB safety composite

Kendall Electric - ESCB scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2021

Kendall Electric - ESCB injury rate improved

Kendall Electric - ESCB's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423610 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/30
  • PHOTO US - Branch Network …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: US - Branch Network : 0041 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Kendall Electric - ESCB in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kendall Electric - ESCB averages 0.8 TCR (39% of the Alarm apparatus, electric, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kendall Electric - ESCB TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2018=2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Kendall Electric - ESCB falls in its industry

1,190 Alarm apparatus, electric, mer establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 30 Alarm apparatus, electric, mer employers in Michigan.

Kendall Electric - ESCB (50 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kendall Electric - ESCB
Kendall Electric - ESCB (50 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Kendall Electric - ESCB has more employees than the Alarm apparatus, electric, merchant whol median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2016 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423610 · MI · Grand Rapids

1,190 Alarm apparatus, electric, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR US - Branch Network : 0041 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR La Porte, TX 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ELLEN LIGHTING & HARDWARE 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR US - Branch Network : 0104 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Commonwealth Commerce Center 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Midland 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-City Acoustical 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4066_7786 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Supply Chain : Madisonville, Ky 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR US040: Allied Phoenix 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR electric 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ideal Images, Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advanced Government Services, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE IKONICS Grand Ave 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Works Department 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peace River Center - Gilmore Outpatient 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.