Starch glues manufacturing · Michigan

Kent Manufacturing Company

Grand Rapids, MI · ~72 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kent Manufacturing Company runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Starch glues manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Kent Manufacturing Company: 3.0 TCR = 90% of Starch glues manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kent Manufacturing Company safety composite

Kent Manufacturing Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kent Manufacturing Company: 0.0 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 188.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.34× in 2024

Kent Manufacturing Company's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 188.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325520 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #11/24
  • PHOTO Henkel U.S Operations
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Henkel U.S Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Kent Manufacturing Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kent Manufacturing Company averages 3.0 TCR (90% of the Starch glues manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kent Manufacturing Company TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=188.2 · 2022=1 · 2023=1 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Kent Manufacturing Company falls in its industry

287 Starch glues manufacturing establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 24 Starch glues manufacturing employers in Michigan.

Kent Manufacturing Company (72 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kent Manufacturing Company
Kent Manufacturing Company (72 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Kent Manufacturing Company has more employees than the Starch glues manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 0 1 0
2023 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 188.2 176.5 1 15 0
2020 12.1 12.1 0 1 0
2019 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.9 1.9 2 1 0
2017 4.3 4.3 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325520 · MI · Grand Rapids

287 Starch glues manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Henkel U.S Operations 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dymax Corporation (HQ & Adhesives) 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lock and Seal Division 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Driven Grow LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elite Apple Company, LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lynn Mayer's Great Lakes Glads, Inc. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navitas House 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR SupplyOne Wisconsin LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR REC - Culpeper 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Plaskolite, LLC - Zanesville 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 155 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Park View Rehabilitation Center 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yuma Cooler 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Craddock Terry Hotel, Waterstone and Shoemakers 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Danbert, Inc. 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.