Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing · South Carolina

Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc.

Greenville, SC · ~79 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc.: 2.9 TCR = 89% of Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. safety composite

Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2019→2020

Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. injury rate improved

Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.6 from 3.3 in 2019 to 2.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.3 · 2020=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325520 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 89% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO Kent Manufacturing C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kent Manufacturing Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. averages 2.9 TCR (89% of the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. TCR series: 2019=3.3 · 2020=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. falls in its industry

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, den establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Adhesives (except asphalt, den employers in South Carolina.

Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. (79 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc.
Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. (79 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. has more employees than the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2019 3.3 3.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325520 · SC · Greenville

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kent Manufacturing Company 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lock and Seal Division 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAPEI Tempe 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Albany 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CL Benton & Sons, Inc. 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE True Timber Outdoors Holding 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glendinning Products LLC 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Caviness 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HoneywellIL75 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas - T1 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR AAF Flanders Atlanta 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE bpm Whitesburg, KY 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boyer's Food Markets -Fleetwood 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burlington Ma Store 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynamic Industries, Inc. - Scaffolding 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.