Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Florida

Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale

Dania Beach, FL · ~178 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade B.

Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale: 3.2 TCR = 70% of Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale safety composite

Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2022→2023

Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale injury rate improved

Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale's TCR fell 0.9 from 3.6 in 2022 to 2.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.6 · 2023=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Dania Beach, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.2 · 70% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Fresno,CA - East Ave
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~178 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fresno,CA - East Ave (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale averages 3.2 TCR (70% of the Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale TCR series: 2022=3.6 · 2023=2.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale falls in its industry

421 Local transit systems, mixed m establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Local transit systems, mixed m employers in Florida.

Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale (178 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale
Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale (178 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Keolis North America Ft. Lauderdale has fewer employees than the Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.7 2.7 4 0 0
2022 3.6 3.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · FL · Dania Beach

421 Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 35 employers in Dania Beach, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fresno,CA - East Ave 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6091-722 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 55312 BWI Airport Shuttle 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Transit El Monte 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Community Asphalt Corp-Vero project 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ascend Performance Materials Cantonment FL 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Best Roofing Services, LLC - Fort Lauderdale 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Drummond Press Inc. 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dania Entertainment Center LLC 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR keolis ft lauderdale 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hollywood35390 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 0715 153 FTE
NAT-TCR Milling Machinery, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Niehoff Endex North America Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Terminal-DOT 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Salisbury Hatchery #3 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Applied Solutions Group (ASG) : Kinedyne-Alabama 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roxboro Nc 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taylor Community - Laconia 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DSF6 178 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.