Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Colorado

Keslaw Logistics LLC

Denver, CO · ~95 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keslaw Logistics LLC runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Keslaw Logistics LLC: 8.1 TCR = 124% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keslaw Logistics LLC safety composite

Keslaw Logistics LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.5

2022→2024

Keslaw Logistics LLC injury rate improved

Keslaw Logistics LLC's TCR fell 12.5 from 18.4 in 2022 to 5.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=18.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.1 · 124% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #41/140
  • PHOTO TXDEL - DEL RIO
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TXDEL - DEL RIO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Keslaw Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keslaw Logistics LLC averages 8.1 TCR (124% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keslaw Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=18.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Keslaw Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 140 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Colorado.

Keslaw Logistics LLC (95 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Keslaw Logistics LLC
Keslaw Logistics LLC (95 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Keslaw Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 2.9 6 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 18.4 8.0 14 2 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CO · Denver

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TXDEL - DEL RIO 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 12606 FUQUA 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 440 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DBC3 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nunn Construction, Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Altitude Energy, LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE EAP Glass Inc 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Academy Roofing Inc. 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Carver County Community Development Agency 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 10643 Lakeview 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Glen Ivy Hot Springs 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BNZ Materials Inc 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ploger Transportation 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE D1930 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Railcar Services - Fitzgerald, Georgia LLC 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Circle S Ranch NC 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.