Real estate property managers' offices, residential · Minnesota

Carver County Community Development Agency

Chaska, MN · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carver County Community Development Agency runs at 576% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Real estate property managers' offices, residential workplace, earning a grade F.

Carver County Community Development Agency: 8.1 TCR = 576% of Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS 1.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carver County Community Development Agency safety composite

Carver County Community Development Agency scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carver County Community Development Agency: 3.5 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 14.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.74× in 2024

Carver County Community Development Agency's TCR rose 2.5 from 3.5 in 2022 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Chaska, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 576% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #19/26
  • PHOTO River Ridge Retireme…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: River Ridge Retirement Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Carver County Community Development Agency in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carver County Community Development Agency averages 8.1 TCR (576% of the Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carver County Community Development Agency TCR series: 2022=3.5 · 2023=14.7 · 2024=6 · BLS 1.4

Where Carver County Community Development Agency falls in its industry

500 Real estate property managers' establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 26 Real estate property managers' employers in Minnesota.

Carver County Community Development Agency (33 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carver County Community Development Agency
Carver County Community Development Agency (33 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Carver County Community Development Agency has fewer employees than the Real estate property managers' offices, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 6.0 2 0 0
2023 14.7 14.7 3 2 0
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · MN · Chaska

500 Real estate property managers' offices, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 87 employers in Chaska, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR River Ridge Retirement Village 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danbury Mt. Vernon 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riedman Properties EP1 LLC 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Lake Assisted Living & Memory Care 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Perham Egg LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gorans Brothers Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Las Vegas Raiders 17150004 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loeffler Construction & Consulting 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska 917 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Region Medical 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Entegris - Chaska 731 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration 596 FTE
NAT-TCR Keslaw Logistics LLC 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Glen Ivy Hot Springs 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 10643 Lakeview 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BNZ Materials Inc 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beehive Buildings Holdings Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Van Born 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Jewel 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE WB Interiors, LLC 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.