Footing and foundation concrete contractors · Texas

Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio

Shertz, TX · ~313 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Footing and foundation concrete contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio: 3.1 TCR = 111% of Footing and foundation concrete contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio safety composite

Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2022

Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio injury rate improved

Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio's TCR fell 1.2 from 2.9 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Shertz, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 111% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #85/125
  • PHOTO Upland Concrete
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 78 inj
  • SIZE ~313 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Upland Concrete (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio averages 3.1 TCR (111% of the Footing and foundation concrete contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio falls in its industry

1,314 Footing and foundation concret establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 125 Footing and foundation concret employers in Texas.

Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio (313 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio
Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio (313 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio has more employees than the Footing and foundation concrete contract median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.8 1.5 6 0 0
2021 3.4 2.7 14 0 0
2020 3.9 1.2 12 1 0
2019 3.8 0.8 14 0 0
2018 3.8 1.3 15 0 0
2017 2.2 1.7 8 0 0
2016 2.9 1.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · TX · Shertz

1,314 Footing and foundation concrete contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Upland Concrete 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Potomac Surfacing LLC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR All American Concrete Form 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reese Enterprises Inc 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HES Brownfield - North Facility 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rebar Reinforcement Placers, LLC 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCormick 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sonny's Car Wash Services Texas 107 FTE
NAT-TCR Norcross GA Yard 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SuperMax Manati 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Koch Air - St. Louis 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SanCasT 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2904-ASM-KY 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE 056944-Santa Barbara Ca P&Dc 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6925-SAN 313 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.