Chocolate, confectionery, made from cacao beans · Pennsylvania

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1

West Reading, PA · ~313 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
4.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1 runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Chocolate, confectionery, made from cacao beans workplace, earning a grade D.

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1: 6.4 TCR = 152% of Chocolate, confectionery, made from cacao beans BLS 4.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1 safety composite

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1: 7.3 → 10.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.45× in 2022

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1's TCR rose 3.0 from 7.3 in 2016 to 10.4 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311351 · West Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 152% of ind

  • DART 9.2 DART
  • RANK #19/23
  • PHOTO Dandelion Chocolate
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 93 inj
  • SIZE ~313 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dandelion Chocolate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1 averages 6.4 TCR (152% of the Chocolate, confectionery, made from cacao beans BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1 TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=2.2 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=10.4 · BLS 4.2

Where R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1 falls in its industry

65 Chocolate, confectionery, made establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 23 Chocolate, confectionery, made employers in Pennsylvania.

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1 (313 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 178 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1
R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1 (313 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 178 employees and a TCR of 3.5

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #1 has more employees than the Chocolate, confectionery, made from caca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 10.4 9.2 18 0 0
2021 6.2 4.3 7 10 0
2019 2.2 1.6 7 0 0
2018 6.8 6.2 22 0 0
2017 5.3 3.8 17 0 0
2016 7.3 7.3 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311351 · PA · West Reading

65 Chocolate, confectionery, made from cacao beans employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 19 employers in West Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dandelion Chocolate 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gertrude Hawk Chocolates 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barry Callebaut Chicago Manufacturing 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR R. M. Palmer Company - Building #3 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Kennett Square 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Plant 2 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE UPMC Community Provider Services Inc 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Southampton Estates 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 6,246 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOWER HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP 1,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gage Personnel West Reading 805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tower Health Urgent Care 287 FTE
NAT-TCR The Kensington 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Babbitt Bearings, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Los Angeles Country Club 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0618 JBS Pilgrim's Moorefield Cook Plant 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2904-ASM-KY 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keystone Concrete Placement San Antonio 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE 056944-Santa Barbara Ca P&Dc 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6925-SAN 313 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.