Drop forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Pennsylvania

Keystone Forging Co.

Northumberland, PA · ~54 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keystone Forging Co. runs at 670% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Drop forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade F.

Keystone Forging Co.: 22.1 TCR = 670% of Drop forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keystone Forging Co. safety composite

Keystone Forging Co. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Keystone Forging Co.: 13.6 → 19.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 37.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.29× in 2024

Keystone Forging Co.'s TCR rose 5.9 from 13.6 in 2018 to 19.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 37.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Northumberland, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.1 · 670% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #35/35
  • PHOTO Jefferson Division
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jefferson Division (1.8 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Keystone Forging Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keystone Forging Co. averages 22.1 TCR (670% of the Drop forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keystone Forging Co. TCR series: 2018=13.6 · 2022=37.9 · 2023=17.4 · 2024=19.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Keystone Forging Co. falls in its industry

241 Drop forgings made from purcha establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 35 Drop forgings made from purcha employers in Pennsylvania.

Keystone Forging Co. (54 employees, TCR 22.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Keystone Forging Co.
Keystone Forging Co. (54 employees, TCR 22.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Keystone Forging Co. has fewer employees than the Drop forgings made from purchased iron o median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.5 6.5 9 0 0
2023 17.4 9.6 9 0 0
2022 37.9 13.3 20 0 0
2018 13.6 13.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · PA · Northumberland

241 Drop forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 18 employers in Northumberland, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jefferson Division 20.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medico Industries, Inc. Sunshine 20.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unit Drop Forge 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KT Acquisition LLC dba Komtek Forge 24.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRIPLE-M-FARMS 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scrubgrass Reclamation Company L.P. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 269-NiSource-Washington PA-Service 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wagman Construction Inc. 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leeds Health Care Services d.b.a. Nottingham Village 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nottingham Village 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR Strong Spas 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masonite Corp. - Northumberland 213 FTE
NAT-TCR Community Addiction Recovery Enterprise - Willmar 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ILC030 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Redwood Empire Fenceline 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Accura Healthcare of Knoxville 22.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Nurseries Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sprayfoams Roofing Southwest 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continental Identification Products 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9221 Globe 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.