Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · Michigan

Continental Identification Products

Sparta, MI · ~54 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continental Identification Products runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade D.

Continental Identification Products: 6.1 TCR = 184% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continental Identification Products safety composite

Continental Identification Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2016→2024

Continental Identification Products injury rate improved

Continental Identification Products's TCR fell 7.3 from 7.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 20.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2017=20.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=10.2 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Sparta, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 184% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #45/55
  • PHOTO Curtis 1000 Inc. - 0…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Curtis 1000 Inc. - 0223-MNFR1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Continental Identification Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continental Identification Products averages 6.1 TCR (184% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Continental Identification Products TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=20.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=10.2 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Continental Identification Products falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 55 Offset printing (except books, employers in Michigan.

Continental Identification Products (54 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Continental Identification Products
Continental Identification Products (54 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Continental Identification Products has fewer employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2022 7.8 4.7 5 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2020 10.2 5.8 6 1 0
2019 4.1 2.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 20.6 10.3 4 0 0
2016 7.3 1.8 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MI · Sparta

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 33 employers in Sparta, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Curtis 1000 Inc. - 0223-MNFR1 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LENTEX 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KTP Lexington 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Color Communications, LLC 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Residential Home Builder 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kalamazoo Facility 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE LS Brinker 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITC Operations-319 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Agrico Labor LLC 559 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Formulations 227 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal-Mogul Powertrain 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Division 149 FTE
NAT-TCR Skyrite Lubbock 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - RIC2 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEB9 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Displaycraft Inc 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 9221 Globe 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keystone Forging Co. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Nurseries Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sprayfoams Roofing Southwest 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.