Homes for the elderly without nursing care · Pennsylvania

Kindred Place at Harrisburg

Harrisburg, PA · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kindred Place at Harrisburg runs at 460% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly without nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Kindred Place at Harrisburg: 17.5 TCR = 460% of Homes for the elderly without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kindred Place at Harrisburg safety composite

Kindred Place at Harrisburg scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−26.6

2016→2021

Kindred Place at Harrisburg injury rate improved

Kindred Place at Harrisburg's TCR fell 26.6 from 26.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 26.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=26.6 · 2017=11.5 · 2018=18.0 · 2019=24.3 · 2020=24.4 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Harrisburg, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.5 · 460% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #217/233
  • PHOTO 10786
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10786 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Kindred Place at Harrisburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kindred Place at Harrisburg averages 17.5 TCR (460% of the Homes for the elderly without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kindred Place at Harrisburg TCR series: 2016=26.6 · 2017=11.5 · 2018=18 · 2019=24.3 · 2020=24.4 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Kindred Place at Harrisburg falls in its industry

6,510 Homes for the elderly without establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #217 safest of 233 Homes for the elderly without employers in Pennsylvania.

Kindred Place at Harrisburg (28 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kindred Place at Harrisburg
Kindred Place at Harrisburg (28 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Kindred Place at Harrisburg has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly without nursing ca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 24.4 12.2 1 3 0
2019 24.3 0.0 1 3 0
2018 18.0 6.0 3 0 0
2017 11.5 5.8 2 0 0
2016 26.6 5.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Harrisburg

6,510 Homes for the elderly without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 362 employers in Harrisburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10786 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medford Senior Care 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fullerton MC Care Properties, LLC 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenridge Place 17.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masda Mushroom LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scenery Hill 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Fire and Safety LLC., DBA Ampro Strategic Alliance PA 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bethlehem Energy Center 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle Hospitals 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHS/HARRISBURG HOSPITAL 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pinnacle Health Medical Services 2,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle 2,311 FTE
NAT-TCR The Kinney SLO 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Anaheim, Fire Station #8 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Good Samaritan Society-Wagner 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0493 17.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Place Verona 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Refuse Division - Kapaa Transfer Station 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cram-A-Lot Central 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Fulton County - AFC 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.