Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Pennsylvania

King Of Prussia, PA Office

King of Prussia, PA · ~189 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

King Of Prussia, PA Office runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

King Of Prussia, PA Office: 0.9 TCR = 31% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

King Of Prussia, PA Office safety composite

King Of Prussia, PA Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

King Of Prussia, PA Office: 0.6 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 1.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2021

King Of Prussia, PA Office's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.6 in 2020 to 1.1 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · King of Prussia, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #15/54
  • PHOTO Blue Ridge Power
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~189 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blue Ridge Power (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

King Of Prussia, PA Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows King Of Prussia, PA Office averages 0.9 TCR (31% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

King Of Prussia, PA Office TCR series: 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.1 · BLS 2.8

Where King Of Prussia, PA Office falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 54 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Pennsylvania.

King Of Prussia, PA Office (189 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate King Of Prussia, PA Office
King Of Prussia, PA Office (189 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

King Of Prussia, PA Office has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.1 0.4 3 0 0
2020 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · PA · King of Prussia

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 183 employers in King of Prussia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blue Ridge Power 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA Advanced 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PJVIDALIA: Vidalia GA - 3759 McIntosh 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windy City Tower Techs LLC 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michels Pipeline- Washington, PA 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Philadelphia 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darlington 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Modular Inc - Strattanville, PA 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR 199897 9,243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) 2,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSL Behring, King of Prussia 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPH2 1,109 FTE
NAT-TCR KB Home Raleigh-Durham Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CTS St. Louis 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Creek 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodruff 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blackmon Mooring of Houston, LLC 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE corporate 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Murphy Medical Center 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mary Black Health System 189 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.