Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings · New York

King Towers Consolidation

New York, NY · ~50 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

King Towers Consolidation runs at 343% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings workplace, earning a grade F.

King Towers Consolidation: 4.8 TCR = 343% of Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

King Towers Consolidation safety composite

King Towers Consolidation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

King Towers Consolidation: 4.3 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.31× in 2024

King Towers Consolidation's TCR rose 2.0 from 4.3 in 2017 to 6.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.8 · 343% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #218/364
  • PHOTO Adams Houses
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Adams Houses (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

King Towers Consolidation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows King Towers Consolidation averages 4.8 TCR (343% of the Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

King Towers Consolidation TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=2 · 2022=4 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 1.4

Where King Towers Consolidation falls in its industry

1,100 Lessors of residential buildin establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #218 safest of 364 Lessors of residential buildin employers in New York.

King Towers Consolidation (50 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate King Towers Consolidation
King Towers Consolidation (50 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

King Towers Consolidation has more employees than the Lessors of residential buildings and dwe median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 6.3 3 0 0
2023 6.1 4.1 3 0 0
2022 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2019 11.5 9.2 5 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2017 4.3 4.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · NY · New York

1,100 Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Adams Houses 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beach 41st St/Oceanside 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AH4R - Chicago 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Albany 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction Group 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vacri Construction Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rifenburg Contracting Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Development, Inc. 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR 5753 - Peoria 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PACE Supply OAHU 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oxford Derby Memory Care, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hamilton Medical Center 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE East Side Center & Billing 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Dorado Dry Ice Plant 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Logan Township 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5727 - Providence 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.