Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins · Michigan

Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc.

Canton, MI · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc. runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins workplace, earning a grade D.

Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc.: 5.7 TCR = 172% of Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc. safety composite

Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc.: 5.2 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2024

Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc.'s TCR rose 1.0 from 5.2 in 2022 to 6.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325991 · Canton, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 172% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #17/20
  • PHOTO RTP COMPANY-FORT WORTH
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RTP COMPANY-FORT WORTH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc. averages 5.7 TCR (172% of the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc. TCR series: 2022=5.2 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc. falls in its industry

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blen establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 20 Custom compounding (i.e., blen employers in Michigan.

Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc. (67 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc.
Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc. (67 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Kingfa Science & Technology USA Inc. has fewer employees than the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 2.5 5 0 0
2022 5.2 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325991 · MI · Canton

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 122 employers in Canton, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RTP COMPANY-FORT WORTH 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pol Tex International 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premiere Packaging, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1112 River Street 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cadillac SC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE CS Erickson 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Contracting LLC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leading Edge - Wyoming 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6801 Headquarters 1,085 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Detroit 397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DDT9 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3476 341 FTE
NAT-TCR Terrace of St. Cloud 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 3392 - Pittsburgh Downtown 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Mold & Tool Govt. Division 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SCK4 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE RusCorr II, LLC 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Erie Electric of Columbus, Inc. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magnolia Manor of St. Simons Nursing & Rehab 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE County Fair Food Stores - Dell Rapids 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.