Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) · Arizona

Kingman Fire Department

Name: Kingman Fire Department Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Kingman, AZ · ~79 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 6.3
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kingman Fire Department runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) workplace, earning a grade D.

Kingman Fire Department: 6.3 TCR = 196% of Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kingman Fire Department safety composite

Kingman Fire Department scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 6.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers
DART rate: C 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2017→2018

Kingman Fire Department injury rate improved

Kingman Fire Department's TCR fell 5.6 from 9.1 in 2017 to 3.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.1 · 2018=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Kingman, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 196% of ind

DART 2.3 DART
RANK #10/20
PHOTO Jr. Lifeguard HQ
BOOK 2y book
INJ 8 inj
SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jr. Lifeguard HQ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

This site

6.3
Jr. Lifeguard

6.3
Kill Devil Hil

6.3
City of Royal

6.3
City of Goldsb

6.2

What this shows Kingman Fire Department averages 6.3 TCR (196% of the Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS benchmark).

Kingman Fire Department TCR series: 2017=9.1 · 2018=3.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Kingman Fire Department falls in its industry

793 Fire departments (e.g., govern establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 20 Fire departments (e.g., govern employers in Arizona.

Kingman Fire Department (79 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Kingman Fire Department has more employees than the Fire departments (e.g., government, volu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	3.5	2.3	2	1	0
2017	9.1	5.7	6	2	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · AZ · Kingman

793 Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 135 employers in Kingman, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Jr. Lifeguard HQ	HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA	6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Kill Devil Hills Fire/EMS	KILL DEVIL HILLS, NC	6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	City of Goldsboro/Fire Station 1	GOLDSBORO, NC	6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	City of Royal Oak - Fire Departments	ROYAL OAK, MI	6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Bud of CA Broccoli AZ	YUMA	79 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Verano CPG Coolidge	COOLIDGE	79 FTE
STATE-SIZE	R. L. Workman Homes, LLC	HEREFORD	79 FTE
STATE-SIZE	EcoDry Restoration of Arizona	CHANDLER	79 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Kingman Healthcare Inc.	Kingman	1,939 FTE
CITY-NEAR	American Woodmark Coorporation, Kingman AZ Plant	Kingman	568 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 2051	Kingman	508 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2051	Kingman	448 FTE
NAT-TCR	Springfield (Maspr)	W Springfield, MA	6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Mercy Home Care	Mason City, IA	6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	FLL - Airport United Airlines Offices	Fort Lauderdale, FL	6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Good Shepherd Rehabilitation & Nursing Center	Jaffrey, NH	6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Runnings of Dickinson	Dickinson, ND	79 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Glenwood Springs (Cogle)	Glenwood Springs, CO	79 FTE
NAT-SIZE	West Branch Center (Miwbr)	West Branch, MI	79 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Las Cruces (Nmlas)	Las Cruces, NM	79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.