Curb and gutter construction, residential and commercial driveway and parking area, concrete · Arizona

HW Johnson Concrete Construction

Phoenix, AZ · ~79 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HW Johnson Concrete Construction runs at 466% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Curb and gutter construction, residential and commercial driveway and parking area, concrete workplace, earning a grade F.

HW Johnson Concrete Construction: 13.0 TCR = 466% of Curb and gutter construction, residential and commercial driveway and parking area, concrete BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HW Johnson Concrete Construction safety composite

HW Johnson Concrete Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.6

2017→2023

HW Johnson Concrete Construction injury rate improved

HW Johnson Concrete Construction's TCR fell 9.6 from 17.4 in 2017 to 7.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.4 · 2022=13.8 · 2023=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.0 · 466% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/43
  • PHOTO Krugel Cobbles
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Krugel Cobbles (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

HW Johnson Concrete Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HW Johnson Concrete Construction averages 13.0 TCR (466% of the Curb and gutter construction, residential and commercial driveway and parking area, concrete BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HW Johnson Concrete Construction TCR series: 2017=17.4 · 2022=13.8 · 2023=7.8 · BLS 2.8

Where HW Johnson Concrete Construction falls in its industry

1,634 Curb and gutter construction, establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 43 Curb and gutter construction, employers in Arizona.

HW Johnson Concrete Construction (79 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate HW Johnson Concrete Construction
HW Johnson Concrete Construction (79 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

HW Johnson Concrete Construction has more employees than the Curb and gutter construction, residentia median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.8 0.0 6 0 0
2022 13.8 3.5 12 0 0
2017 17.4 0.0 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · AZ · Phoenix

1,634 Curb and gutter construction, residential and commercial driveway and parking area, concrete employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Krugel Cobbles 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Construction Services, Inc. 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midwest Fence 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carnahan-White LLC 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bud of CA Broccoli AZ 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Verano CPG Coolidge 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE R. L. Workman Homes, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE EcoDry Restoration of Arizona 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Cypress Point Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Vassar-Warner Home 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gresham #047 13.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fresh Market 17th South 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE R.H. Lapp & Sons, Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lyles Utility Construction, LLC. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linden House LLC 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.