Nuclear Electric Power Generation · North Carolina

Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility

Kings Mountain, NC · ~78 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nuclear Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade C.

Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility safety composite

Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility held a steady TCR band

Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Kings Mountain, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P100
  • PHOTO R.E. Ginna Nuclear P…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility falls in its industry

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generat establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility (78 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility
Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility (78 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility has fewer employees than the Nuclear Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · NC · Kings Mountain

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 64 employers in Kings Mountain, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Kennett Square 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Cantera 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perry Nuclear Power Plant 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blue Ridge Electric Corporate Office 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forest City location 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ground Thunder Construction 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clark Pavement Marking, Inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanesbrands, Inc. Cleveland Distribution Center 515 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6903_15950 397 FTE
CITY-NEAR KINGS MOUNTAIN NC 370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanesbrands, Inc. Canterbury Distribution Center 368 FTE
NAT-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lawrenceburg 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecker Textiles, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Huntsville Health Care Center 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Environmental Express 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robertson Logistics LLC 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE ADESA Mercer 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.