Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Indiana

Kingston at Dupont

Fort Wayne, IN · ~46 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kingston at Dupont runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Kingston at Dupont: 7.9 TCR = 209% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kingston at Dupont safety composite

Kingston at Dupont scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.4

2016→2024

Kingston at Dupont injury rate improved

Kingston at Dupont's TCR fell 8.4 from 12.4 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.4 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=19.0 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fort Wayne, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 209% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #82/133
  • PHOTO 6273_14737
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6273_14737 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Kingston at Dupont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kingston at Dupont averages 7.9 TCR (209% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kingston at Dupont TCR series: 2016=12.4 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=19 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.8

Where Kingston at Dupont falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 133 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Kingston at Dupont (46 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kingston at Dupont
Kingston at Dupont (46 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Kingston at Dupont has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 9.5 9.5 3 0 0
2021 6.7 6.7 2 0 0
2020 19.0 19.0 6 0 0
2019 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 9.1 9.1 3 0 0
2016 12.4 6.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IN · Fort Wayne

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 634 employers in Fort Wayne, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6273_14737 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Terrace at Priceville 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspirations Bayside Assisted Living and Memory Care 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Breckinridge 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Legacy Parlor 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE 161-NiSource-Hammond IN-Gas Opns Center 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milhaus Construction LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moore Restoration Inc 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Memorial Hospital 6,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview North Hospital 4,648 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Corporate Office 3,312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shambaugh & Son LP 3,072 FTE
NAT-TCR Jerrys Do It Best Hardward Edina - 5212 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lacov - Covington 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Terrace at Priceville 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FED Corporation 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Doris Duke Management Foundation 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Uniflyte, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Regional Hospice 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE NORWALK 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.