Distribution line, sewer and water, construction · Missouri

Kissick Construction

Kansas City, MO · ~364 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kissick Construction runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution line, sewer and water, construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Kissick Construction: 2.3 TCR = 83% of Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kissick Construction safety composite

Kissick Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kissick Construction held a steady TCR band

Kissick Construction's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.2 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.2 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Kansas City, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 83% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #19/27
  • PHOTO Front Royal WWTP Upg…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~364 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Front Royal WWTP Upgrade & Expansion (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Kissick Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kissick Construction averages 2.3 TCR (83% of the Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kissick Construction TCR series: 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Kissick Construction falls in its industry

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and w establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 27 Distribution line, sewer and w employers in Missouri.

Kissick Construction (364 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kissick Construction
Kissick Construction (364 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Kissick Construction has more employees than the Distribution line, sewer and water, cons median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.6 7 0 0
2023 1.6 1.6 6 0 0
2022 2.1 1.2 7 0 0
2021 2.3 1.4 8 0 0
2020 2.6 0.8 10 0 0
2019 3.5 2.6 11 1 0
2018 2.4 2.4 8 0 0
2017 2.2 1.7 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · MO · Kansas City

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and water, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Front Royal WWTP Upgrade & Expansion 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comer Construction, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR K.R. Swerdfeger Construction, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TAB Contractors, Inc. 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mark Andy Inc. 364 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kawasaki Motor MFG. Corp. U.S.A. 364 FTE
STATE-SIZE 95 364 FTE
STATE-SIZE 46 364 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Chemcut 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexandria Technical and Community College 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR US Gypsum Auburn 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NP Gold Rush LLC - dba Wildfire Sunset 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Howard County Kinsey Youth Center 364 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plymouth 364 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denier Electric 364 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corval Group 364 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.