Automatic screw machines, metal cutting type, manufacturing · Michigan

KKSP Precision Machining East China

East China, MI · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

KKSP Precision Machining East China runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Automatic screw machines, metal cutting type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

KKSP Precision Machining East China: 4.0 TCR = 123% of Automatic screw machines, metal cutting type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

KKSP Precision Machining East China safety composite

KKSP Precision Machining East China scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

KKSP Precision Machining East China: 2.8 → 9.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 9.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

KKSP Precision Machining East China's TCR rose 6.6 from 2.8 in 2016 to 9.4 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · East China, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 123% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #35/58
  • PHOTO TEAM Industries
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TEAM Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

KKSP Precision Machining East China in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows KKSP Precision Machining East China averages 4.0 TCR (123% of the Automatic screw machines, metal cutting type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

KKSP Precision Machining East China TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=9.4 · BLS 3.3

Where KKSP Precision Machining East China falls in its industry

391 Automatic screw machines, meta establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 58 Automatic screw machines, meta employers in Michigan.

KKSP Precision Machining East China (35 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate KKSP Precision Machining East China
KKSP Precision Machining East China (35 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

KKSP Precision Machining East China has fewer employees than the Automatic screw machines, metal cutting median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 9.4 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · MI · East China

391 Automatic screw machines, metal cutting type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 8 employers in East China, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TEAM Industries 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Iowa Engineered Processes Corporation 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferguson Perforating Company 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amity Mold Company 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heeren, LLC - 42 North Apples 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harbor Farmz, North LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willow Point Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE POWER & UTILITIES OPERATIONS - ROB 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET216 235 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDET216 ASCENSION RIVER DISTRICT HOSPITAL 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medilodge of St Clair 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET488 101 FTE
NAT-TCR The Elms of Cranbury 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 024/Spartanburg Methodist College 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage of Green Hills 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ESL Facility 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Office - 01 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6340-VIKING-WI010 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZCO INC. - Holly Frontier 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE England Farms 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.