Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing · Rhode Island

Ferguson Perforating Company

Providence, RI · ~90 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ferguson Perforating Company runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ferguson Perforating Company: 4.0 TCR = 121% of Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ferguson Perforating Company safety composite

Ferguson Perforating Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.4

2016→2024

Ferguson Perforating Company injury rate improved

Ferguson Perforating Company's TCR fell 8.4 from 9.9 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.9 · 2017=6.0 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Providence, RI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 121% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Williams Tool, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Williams Tool, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Rhode Island employers → · Look up another →

Ferguson Perforating Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ferguson Perforating Company averages 4.0 TCR (121% of the Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ferguson Perforating Company TCR series: 2016=9.9 · 2017=6 · 2018=6 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Ferguson Perforating Company falls in its industry

391 Machine tools, metal cutting, establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Rhode Island alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Machine tools, metal cutting, employers in Rhode Island.

Ferguson Perforating Company (90 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ferguson Perforating Company
Ferguson Perforating Company (90 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Ferguson Perforating Company has more employees than the Machine tools, metal cutting, manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2022 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.2 4.2 3 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2019 4.4 3.3 4 0 0
2018 6.0 2.0 5 1 0
2017 6.0 0.9 6 1 0
2016 9.9 1.0 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · RI · Providence

391 Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,610 rated employers in Rhode Island with headcount on file · 209 employers in Providence, RI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Williams Tool, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KKSP Precision Machining East China 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial Tool & Die 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peiffer Machine Services 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 433 JOHNSTON, RI 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE 71207 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE 547 Smithfield 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10602 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rhode Island Hospital 7,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Providence 4,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Miriam Hospital 3,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Women & Infants Hospital 2,195 FTE
NAT-TCR Agoura Sash and Door Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR RML SpecialtyHospital Hinsdale 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodsage LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR S09296 - Great Oak Landfill 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Jr. High School 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guadalupe Valley Nursing Center and Rehabilitation Center 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE AFP Distributors Inc. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silver Pines Nursing and Rehab 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.