CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) systems integration design services · Pennsylvania

Kline Process Systems

Reading, PA · ~49 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kline Process Systems runs at 720% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) systems integration design services workplace, earning a grade F.

Kline Process Systems: 3.6 TCR = 720% of CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) systems integration design services BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kline Process Systems safety composite

Kline Process Systems scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2020→2022

Kline Process Systems injury rate improved

Kline Process Systems's TCR fell 5.0 from 6.9 in 2020 to 1.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.9 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.6 · 720% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Ocado Solutions USA …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ocado Solutions USA Aurora (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Kline Process Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kline Process Systems averages 3.6 TCR (720% of the CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) systems integration design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kline Process Systems TCR series: 2020=6.9 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.9 · BLS 0.5

Where Kline Process Systems falls in its industry

181 CAM (computer-aided manufactur establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 CAM (computer-aided manufactur employers in Pennsylvania.

Kline Process Systems (49 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Kline Process Systems
Kline Process Systems (49 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Kline Process Systems has fewer employees than the CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) syste median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 6.9 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · PA · Reading

181 CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) systems integration design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ocado Solutions USA Aurora 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cart.com - SLC1 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ocado Solutions USA Middleton 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bonnie Brae Fruit Farms, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & L Orchard Co. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vallorani Mushrooms 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Story of PA- Smithfield (AWH) 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Custom Cooling 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Super Radiator Coils 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Fabrication & Steel LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100893 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Champion Fire Protection Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE APMP 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSP Clearwater 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern Forge Texas, LLC 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.