CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) systems integration design services · Arizona

Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys

Phoenix, AZ · ~101 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys runs at 686% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) systems integration design services workplace, earning a grade F.

Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys: 3.4 TCR = 686% of CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) systems integration design services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys safety composite

Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2018→2020

Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys injury rate improved

Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys's TCR fell 0.8 from 3.8 in 2018 to 3.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.8 · 2020=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.4 · 686% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Ocado Solutions USA …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ocado Solutions USA Aurora (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys averages 3.4 TCR (686% of the CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) systems integration design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys TCR series: 2018=3.8 · 2020=3 · BLS 0.5

Where Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys falls in its industry

181 CAM (computer-aided manufactur establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 CAM (computer-aided manufactur employers in Arizona.

Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys (101 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys
Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys (101 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys has fewer employees than the CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) syste median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2018 3.8 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · AZ · Phoenix

181 CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) systems integration design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ocado Solutions USA Aurora 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kline Process Systems 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cart.com - SLC1 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Barkley Company of Arizona 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nesbitt Contracting Co., Inc. 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.B. Steel 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Burgos Group 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Colonial Oaks Living Center, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR S04971 - El Cajon Hauling 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AlphaVesselCo LLC, Moss Point, MS Facility 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quest 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warehouse 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franklin Equipment - Groveport 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northstar Metal Products 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.