Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction · Indiana

KM Plant Services, Inc.

Highland, IN · ~584 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

KM Plant Services, Inc. runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction workplace, earning a grade A.

KM Plant Services, Inc.: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

KM Plant Services, Inc. safety composite

KM Plant Services, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

KM Plant Services, Inc. held a steady TCR band

KM Plant Services, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Highland, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/33
  • PHOTO SCA Construction
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~584 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCA Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

KM Plant Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows KM Plant Services, Inc. averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

KM Plant Services, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.3 · BLS 2.8

Where KM Plant Services, Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Cleaning building interiors du establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 33 Cleaning building interiors du employers in Indiana.

KM Plant Services, Inc. (584 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate KM Plant Services, Inc.
KM Plant Services, Inc. (584 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

KM Plant Services, Inc. has more employees than the Cleaning building interiors during and i median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.3 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.5 0.3 3 0 0
2017 0.5 0.2 3 0 0
2016 0.5 0.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · IN · Highland

1,634 Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 27 employers in Highland, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCA Construction 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ExxonMobil Baytown Refinery Baytown TX 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandSafway Services, LLC - Las Vegas - Branch 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandSafway Solutions, LLC - Lexington Branch 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE KZ 584 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8027615-VALEO 584 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office Building 583 FTE
STATE-SIZE GC Fulfillment, LLC 585 FTE
CITY-NEAR K2 Industrial Services 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR EMCOR Hyre Electric 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer, Inc 170 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Highland 255 FTE
NAT-TCR EBAD-MK 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dynaco USA 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City Treasurer 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Monterey Park Rehabilitation and Health Care Center 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : MFG-Columbia, SC-USA 584 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glendora Regional Office 584 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Mary Medical Center 584 FTE
NAT-SIZE MO Central - PLANO TX 584 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.