Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Texas

Knight Aerospace Medical Systems

San Antonio, TX · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Knight Aerospace Medical Systems runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Knight Aerospace Medical Systems: 7.4 TCR = 225% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Knight Aerospace Medical Systems safety composite

Knight Aerospace Medical Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Knight Aerospace Medical Systems held a steady TCR band

Knight Aerospace Medical Systems's TCR held near 0.0 from 7.4 in 2020 to 7.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=7.4 · 2021=7.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.4 · 225% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #38/39
  • PHOTO Triumph Aerospace St…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Triumph Aerospace Structures (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Knight Aerospace Medical Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Knight Aerospace Medical Systems averages 7.4 TCR (225% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Knight Aerospace Medical Systems TCR series: 2020=7.4 · 2021=7.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Knight Aerospace Medical Systems falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 39 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Texas.

Knight Aerospace Medical Systems (52 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Knight Aerospace Medical Systems
Knight Aerospace Medical Systems (52 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Knight Aerospace Medical Systems has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.4 1.5 4 1 0
2020 7.4 7.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · TX · San Antonio

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Triumph Aerospace Structures 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leading Technology Composites ASD 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TIGHITCO Inc Aerostructures Group 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lamsco 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE KR SGHS 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cactus Feeders 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hale Center Feedyard 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Idalou Egg Ranch LP 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Dutchmen Plant 802 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Meals on Wheels by ACC 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunflower #9126 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FiberClass Insulation #210 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shreveport Food 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mobile Division Hillcrest 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Montana Nursing & Rehabilitation 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Checkers Justrite Safety Group- Titusville 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.