Container trucking services, local · Texas

Knight Transportation - Houston Ports

La Porte, TX · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Knight Transportation - Houston Ports runs at 157% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Container trucking services, local workplace, earning a grade D.

Knight Transportation - Houston Ports: 7.1 TCR = 157% of Container trucking services, local BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Knight Transportation - Houston Ports safety composite

Knight Transportation - Houston Ports scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.5

2022→2024

Knight Transportation - Houston Ports injury rate improved

Knight Transportation - Houston Ports's TCR fell 8.5 from 13.5 in 2022 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=13.5 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · La Porte, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 157% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #124/175
  • PHOTO NEWBURGH (NYMON)
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NEWBURGH (NYMON) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Knight Transportation - Houston Ports in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Knight Transportation - Houston Ports averages 7.1 TCR (157% of the Container trucking services, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Knight Transportation - Houston Ports TCR series: 2022=13.5 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=5 · BLS 4.5

Where Knight Transportation - Houston Ports falls in its industry

2,784 Container trucking services, l establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #124 safest of 175 Container trucking services, l employers in Texas.

Knight Transportation - Houston Ports (34 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Knight Transportation - Houston Ports
Knight Transportation - Houston Ports (34 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Knight Transportation - Houston Ports has fewer employees than the Container trucking services, local median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.7 0.0 2 0 0
2022 13.5 8.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · TX · La Porte

2,784 Container trucking services, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 170 employers in La Porte, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NEWBURGH (NYMON) 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARMADA SHIPPING LLC 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DCC : 5916-00 VW-BHC-DCC/Cranbury, NJ 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DCC : 5941-00 ALDI-BHC-DCC/Saxonburg, PA 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SOUTHWEST FEED YARD 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Tulia 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineywoods 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXP 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold, Ltd. 2,821 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold Specialty, Ltd. 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR TURN 2 Specialty Companies 1,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dashiell Corp/Dacon Corp 973 FTE
NAT-TCR JRayl Transport, Inc 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Flowers Baking Company of Lenexa 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Princeton Rehabilitation and Health Care Center 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PCC Community Markets - Central Kitchen 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weaver Bros., Inc. Kenai Terminal 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Costa Mesa - Brookfield Properties Development LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moody Construction Services, Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.